Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP.

Fourth Circuit

Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP.

389 F. App'x 306

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2010·No. No. 10-1119·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Katz appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 8, 2010 & entered Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Katz appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 8, 2010 & entered Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP., 389 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

389 F. App'x 306 (Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.