Katz v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Katz v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

762 So. 2d 1069, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9641, 2000 WL 1060519

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 2, 2000

DocketNo. 4D99-3892

StatusPublished

This text of 762 So. 2d 1069 (Katz v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 762 So. 2d 1069, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9641, 2000 WL 1060519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alexander Katz, appeals from the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s (UAC) reversal of the appeals referee’s award of unemployment compensation to appellant. “The UAC’s standard of review of the appeals referee’s decision is whether the referee’s findings of fact were based on competent, substantial evidence in the record and whether the proceedings on which the findings were based complied with the [1070]*1070essential requirements of the law.” San Roman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 711 So.2d 93, 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We find that the appeals referee’s decision was based upon competent, substantial evidence and that the referee’s findings complied with the essential requirements of law. The UAC’s decision is reversed.

REVERSED.

WARNER, C.J., HAZOURI, J., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., Ill, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Alexander Katz, appeals from the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s (UAC) reversal of the appeals referee’s award of unemployment compensation to appellant. “The UAC’s standard of review of the appeals referee’s decision is whether the referee’s findings of fact were based on competent, substantial evidence in the record and whether the proceedings on which the findings were based complied with the [1070]*1070essential requirements of the law.” San Roman v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 711 So.2d 93, 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We find that the appeals referee’s decision was based upon competent, substantial evidence and that the referee’s findings complied with the essential requirements of law. The UAC’s decision is reversed.

REVERSED.

WARNER, C.J., HAZOURI, J., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., Ill, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 So. 2d 1069, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9641, 2000 WL 1060519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack