Katz v. Essex Sales Co.

138 A. 921, 104 N.J.L. 174, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 311
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1927·Published

Opinion

*175 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katz v. Essex Sales Co., 138 A. 921, 104 N.J.L. 174, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 311 (N.J. 1927).

138 A. 921 (Katz v. Essex Sales Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.