Katz v. Connecticut General Insurance

240 A.D. 797

This text of 240 A.D. 797 (Katz v. Connecticut General Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katz v. Connecticut General Insurance, 240 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without prejudice to application by defendant at Special Term, before Foster, J., for a resettlement of the order appealed from. Appeal from order giving preference on calendar dismissed, with ten dollars costs, on the ground it is not appealable. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-connecticut-general-insurance-nyappdiv-1933.