Katz v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katz v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

236 A.D. 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 744 (Katz v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 236 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, as resettled, modified by striking therefrom the provisión that the defendant forthwith deliver to the plaintiff the assets, moneys and securities received or held by the said defendant under and pursuant to the agreement mentioned in the complaint and answer, or any substitution for said assets, and by providing that said assets, moneys and securities be delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant on the coming in and confirmation of the report of the referee provided for in said order, upon the payment by the plaintiff to the defendant of the sum of money that may be found due to the defendant from the plaintiff on such accounting for its commissions and expenses. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompldns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, as resettled, modified by striking therefrom the provisión that the defendant forthwith deliver to the plaintiff the assets, moneys and securities received or held by the said defendant under and pursuant to the agreement mentioned in the complaint and answer, or any substitution for said assets, and by providing that said assets, moneys and securities be delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant on the coming in and confirmation of the report of the referee provided for in said order, upon the payment by the plaintiff to the defendant of the sum of money that may be found due to the defendant from the plaintiff on such accounting for its commissions and expenses. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompldns, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-central-hanover-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1932.