Katz v. Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
DAVID EFREM KATZ, Case No. 24-cv-4245 (LMP/ECW)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondent.
This matter is before the Court on the July 24, 2025 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, which recommends denying Petitioner David Efrem Katz’s habeas petition as moot. See ECF No. 25. No party objected to the R&R, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), so the Court reviews the R&R for clear error, Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Discerning no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in full. ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The Amended Petition (ECF No. 13) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: August 11, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katz v. Bureau of Prisons (Katz v. Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.