Katz v. Atfield

City of New York Municipal Court

Katz v. Atfield

22 N.Y.S. 1135

DecidedMarch 17, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.Y.S. 1135 (Katz v. Atfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Atfield, 22 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

FITZSIMONS, J.

The order of the general term of this court, dated November, 1893, required the payment by the appellants herein of $30, costs imposed by the order of Justice McCarthy, as well as all other motion costs imposed at any time by the court against said appellants, and unpaid at the time of the making of the said general term order. Whatever the amount of said costs were, appellants were bound to know, and respondent herein was notrequired to tax the same by the clerk of this court. The appellants’ failure to pay such costs entitled the special term justice to make the order appealed from, whenever it appeared to his satisfaction that the conditions and requirements of said general term order were not complied with. The appeal papers show that the appellants herein failed to comply with said general term order, and therefore the order appealed from was rightly made, and must be affirmed, with costs. See 17 N. Y. Supp. 447 ; 20 N. Y. Supp. 892.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FITZSIMONS, J.

The order of the general term of this court, dated November, 1893, required the payment by the appellants herein of $30, costs imposed by the order of Justice McCarthy, as well as all other motion costs imposed at any time by the court against said appellants, and unpaid at the time of the making of the said general term order. Whatever the amount of said costs were, appellants were bound to know, and respondent herein was notrequired to tax the same by the clerk of this court. The appellants’ failure to pay such costs entitled the special term justice to make the order appealed from, whenever it appeared to his satisfaction that the conditions and requirements of said general term order were not complied with. The appeal papers show that the appellants herein failed to comply with said general term order, and therefore the order appealed from was rightly made, and must be affirmed, with costs. See 17 N. Y. Supp. 447 ; 20 N. Y. Supp. 892.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-atfield-nynyccityct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack