Katz v. Atfield

New York City Court

Katz v. Atfield

51 N.Y. St. Rep. 947

DecidedMarch 17, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 947 (Katz v. Atfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Atfield, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 947 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

The order of the general term' of this court, dated ¡November, 1892, required the payment by the appellant herein of thirty dollars costs imposed by the order of Justice McCarthy as well as all other motion costs imposed at any time by the court against said appellant and unpaid at the time of the making of the said general term order.

Whatever the amount of said costs were, appellant was bound to know, and respondent herein was not required to tax the same by the clerk of this court.

The appellant’s failure to pay snch costs entitled the special term justice to> make the order appealed from, whenever it appeared to his satisfaction that the conditions and requirements of said general term order were not complied with.

The appeal papers show that the appellant herein failed to comply with said general term order, and therefore the order appealed from was rightly made and must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzsimons, J.

The order of the general term' of this court, dated ¡November, 1892, required the payment by the appellant herein of thirty dollars costs imposed by the order of Justice McCarthy as well as all other motion costs imposed at any time by the court against said appellant and unpaid at the time of the making of the said general term order.

Whatever the amount of said costs were, appellant was bound to know, and respondent herein was not required to tax the same by the clerk of this court.

The appellant’s failure to pay snch costs entitled the special term justice to> make the order appealed from, whenever it appeared to his satisfaction that the conditions and requirements of said general term order were not complied with.

The appeal papers show that the appellant herein failed to comply with said general term order, and therefore the order appealed from was rightly made and must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 N.Y. St. Rep. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-atfield-nycityct-1893.