Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Katwaroo v. State

Katwaroo v. State

837 So. 2d 612, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936, 2003 WL 366123
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-214
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 837 So. 2d 612 (Katwaroo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katwaroo v. State, 837 So. 2d 612, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936, 2003 WL 366123 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order dismissing defendant’s rule 3.850 motion is affirmed without prejudice to defendant filing a timely motion with either a sworn oath or a declaration. See, e.g., Creel v. State, 769 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming summary denial of postconviction motion that failed to include a proper oath; affirmance [613]*613without prejudice to defendant filing properly sworn motion).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
861 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 612, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936, 2003 WL 366123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katwaroo-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.