Katwaroo v. State
837 So. 2d 612, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936, 2003 WL 366123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2003·No. No. 5D03-214·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s order dismissing defendant’s rule 3.850 motion is affirmed without prejudice to defendant filing a timely motion with either a sworn oath or a declaration. See, e.g., Creel v. State, 769 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming summary denial of postconviction motion that failed to include a proper oath; affirmance [613]*613without prejudice to defendant filing properly sworn motion).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katwaroo v. State, 837 So. 2d 612, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1936, 2003 WL 366123 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
837 So. 2d 612 (Katwaroo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
861 So. 2d 1292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)