Katterschinsky v. Board of Education

215 A.D. 695
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to the board of education in the discharge of its governmental functions. (Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196; Johnson v. Board of Education, 210 App. Div. 723.) The charge here is not that the board of education, as such, was negligent, but that the negligent act was that of the teachers in charge of the athletic exercises that were being conducted in the court yard of the school. We do not, however, intimate that there was negligence on the part of the teachers in charge. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katterschinsky v. Board of Education, 215 A.D. 695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

215 A.D. 695 (Katterschinsky v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gillman v. City of New York
173 Misc. 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Graff v. Board of Education
258 A.D. 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Lessin v. Board of Education
161 N.E. 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)