Katsoris v. Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katsoris v. Police Department

224 A.D.2d 331, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 331 (Katsoris v. Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katsoris v. Police Department, 224 A.D.2d 331, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent New York City Police Department cancelling petitioner’s pistol license and rifle/shotgun permit, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Kristin Booth Glen, J.], entered March 28, 1995) is dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner’s pistol license and rifle/shotgun permit be revoked (see, Waskiewicz v New York City Police Dept., 211 AD2d 603). We decline to disturb the administrative determination as to the credibility of witnesses appearing before the Hearing Officer (see, Sewell v City of New York, 182 AD2d 469, 473, lv denied 80 NY2d 756). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent New York City Police Department cancelling petitioner’s pistol license and rifle/shotgun permit, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Kristin Booth Glen, J.], entered March 28, 1995) is dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner’s pistol license and rifle/shotgun permit be revoked (see, Waskiewicz v New York City Police Dept., 211 AD2d 603). We decline to disturb the administrative determination as to the credibility of witnesses appearing before the Hearing Officer (see, Sewell v City of New York, 182 AD2d 469, 473, lv denied 80 NY2d 756). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 331, 638 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katsoris-v-police-department-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack