Katsampes v. Goodrich
235 A.D. 893
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The finding that the note for $656 was delivered in execution of a usurious contract is amply sustained by the evidence. (Gen. Business Law, § 373; Wright v. Nudd, 233 App. Div. 790; Laskowitz v. Getzowitz, 211 id. 239; Fiedler v. Darrin, 50 N. Y. 437; Gielinski v. Bayer, 222 App. Div. 712.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katsampes v. Goodrich, 235 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 893 (Katsampes v. Goodrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fiedler v. . Darrin
50 N.Y. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Gielinski v. Bayer
222 A.D. 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Wright v. Nudd
233 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)