Kato v. Board of Parole

836 P.2d 1376, 115 Or. App. 175, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kato v. Board of Parole. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Or. App. 661
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 9, 1992·No. CA A67031·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of our decision dismissing his petition for review of an order of the Board of Parole. 111 Or App 661, 825 P2d 663 (1992). We allow reconsideration under ORAP 9.15, withdraw the opinion and address the original petition for review. See Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 834 P2d 547 (1992).

We conclude that petitioner’s claims of error do not merit discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kato v. Board of Parole, 836 P.2d 1376, 115 Or. App. 175, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1716 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

836 P.2d 1376 (Kato v. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. Board of Parole
834 P.2d 547 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Kato v. Board of Parole
825 P.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)