Katine v. Kayro Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katine v. Kayro Realty Co.

282 A.D. 1064, 126 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1064 (Katine v. Kayro Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katine v. Kayro Realty Co., 282 A.D. 1064, 126 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

■ — In Action No. 1 for partition, plaintiffs also seek to have cancelled and marked satisfied a first and a second mortgage. Plaintiffs appeal from an order insofar as it denied their motion for a jury trial of all the issues raised by the pleadings, without prejudice to renewal upon papers setting forth the specific issues upon which the jury trial is sought. Plaintiffs also appeal from said order insofar as it denied their motion for an examination before trial, with leave to renew after an accounting which was ordered. Plaintiffs also appeal from an order on reargument insofar as said order adhered to the original decision. Order on reargument, insofar as appealed from,, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents filing briefs. No opinion. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock. JJ., concur. [See 283 App. Div. 660.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ — In Action No. 1 for partition, plaintiffs also seek to have cancelled and marked satisfied a first and a second mortgage. Plaintiffs appeal from an order insofar as it denied their motion for a jury trial of all the issues raised by the pleadings, without prejudice to renewal upon papers setting forth the specific issues upon which the jury trial is sought. Plaintiffs also appeal from said order insofar as it denied their motion for an examination before trial, with leave to renew after an accounting which was ordered. Plaintiffs also appeal from an order on reargument insofar as said order adhered to the original decision. Order on reargument, insofar as appealed from,, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents filing briefs. No opinion. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock. JJ., concur. [See 283 App. Div. 660.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1064, 126 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katine-v-kayro-realty-co-nyappdiv-1953.