Katie Clubine v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 19, 2008
Docket07-08-00375-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Katie Clubine v. State (Katie Clubine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katie Clubine v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NO. 07-08-0375-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

NOVEMBER 19, 2008

______________________________

KATIE ARSENIA CLUBINE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251st DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 57,281-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant appeals from her conviction for possession of a controlled substance.  The clerk’s record was filed on November 7, 2008, but the reporter’s record has not been filed.  An extension motion was filed by the court reporter on November 14, 2008, representing that appellant has not submitted a written designation for the record.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

    2.  whether appellant is indigent; and,

3.  whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to her indigency.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental records and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before December 19, 2008.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before December 19, 2008.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Katie Clubine v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katie-clubine-v-state-texapp-2008.