Katie Ann Barcelo and Justin Roberts v. City of San Diego, et al.

Opinion

I } KATIE ANN BARCELO and JUSTIN Case No. 25-cv-0329-BAS-AHG ROBERTS, Plaintiffs ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ° UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE V. TO FILE THIRD AMENDED CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., (ECF No 40), Defendants. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 40.) “In general, a court should liberally allow a party to }amend its pleading.” Sonoma Cty. Ass’n of Retired Emps. v. Sonoma Cnty., 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)); see also Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, 712 (9th Cir. 2001) (“A district court ‘shall grant leave amend freely ‘when justice so requires.’”). Having reviewed and considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion (ECF No. 40), the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ leave to file their Third Amended Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Plaintiffs shall file their Third Amended Complaint on the docket no later than May 7, 2026. DATED: April 30, 2026 (i Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge _United States District Court