Katia Duran-Santiago v. Eric Holder, Jr.

427 F. App'x 589
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 2011
Docket09-72237
StatusUnpublished

This text of 427 F. App'x 589 (Katia Duran-Santiago v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katia Duran-Santiago v. Eric Holder, Jr., 427 F. App'x 589 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Katia Kina Duran-Santiago, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err in concluding that Duran-Santiago failed to establish eligibility for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) because the record demonstrates she failed to submit any evidence in support of her eligibility claim. See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d) (alien bears the burden of establishing eligibility for requested relief).

We do not consider the new evidence Duran-Santiago seeks to introduce with her petition for review. See Chouchkov v. INS, 220 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir.2000) (review limited to the administrative record).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katia-duran-santiago-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.