Kathya Romero Velazquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
This text of 491 F. App'x 823 (Kathya Romero Velazquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Because Velazquez’s counsel did not show he obtained his client’s consent to the motion to dismiss he filed on her behalf, the motion is denied. We will consider this case on the merits.
Because Velazquez has not shown that any prejudice resulted from the Immigra *824 tion Judge’s alleged failure to inform her of the potential for pre-conclusion voluntary departure, any right to due process was not violated. See United States v. Calles-Pineda, 627 F.2d 976, 978 (9th Cir.1980); In Re R-S-H, 23 I. & N. Dec. 629, 644 (BIA 2003).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 F. App'x 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathya-romero-velazquez-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2012.