Kathy Thomas v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc.
This text of Kathy Thomas v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc. (Kathy Thomas v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ February 08, 2019
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A19A1277. KATHY THOMAS v. PRESTIGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Prestige Financial Services, Inc. sued Kathy Thomas in magistrate court. The magistrate court entered judgment in favor of Thomas, and Prestige appealed to the state court. Following a de novo review, the state court entered judgment in favor of Prestige. Thomas now appeals directly to this Court, but we lack jurisdiction. Because the state court’s order is a de novo ruling on appeal from a magistrate court decision, Thomas was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to review the case. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/08/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kathy Thomas v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathy-thomas-v-prestige-financial-services-inc-gactapp-2019.