Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2016
Docket01-15-00165-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell (Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00165-CV ——————————— KATHY SHAW, Appellant V. JUANITA CESAR WORRELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1056379

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kathy Shaw, proceeding pro se, appealed from the trial court’s

final judgment, signed on January 12, 2015, in this forcible detainer action. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. However, after the clerk’s record was filed on October 27, 2015, making the appellate record complete because there was no reporter’s

record, appellant failed to timely file her appellate brief. See id. 38.6(a).

On December 16, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that her

appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to timely file her appellate brief, and that

her appeal would be dismissed unless she responded within 10 days. See id.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). The Court’s notice was returned with the following marked on

the envelope: “RETURN TO SENDER[,] NOT DELIVERABLE AS

ADDRESSED[,] UNABLE TO FORWARD.” Appellant has neither timely filed

her brief or other response to the Court’s notice, nor provided the Clerk of this

Court with any other address. See id. 9.1(b) (“A party not represented by counsel

must sign any document . . . and give the party’s mailing address, telephone

number, fax number, if any, and email address.”); 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to

timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kathy Shaw v. Juanita Cesar Worrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathy-shaw-v-juanita-cesar-worrell-texapp-2016.