Kathy May Toth v. Gloria Naegele May
This text of Kathy May Toth v. Gloria Naegele May (Kathy May Toth v. Gloria Naegele May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ March 26, 2019
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A19A1532. KATHY MAY TOTH v. GLORIA NAEGELE MAY.
In October 2018, the trial court entered a default judgment in favor of Gloria Naegele May. Thereafter, in December 2018, Kathy May Toth filed a motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), alleging accident, mistake, and/or excusable neglect. The trial court denied the motion, and Toth filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be made by application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Toth’s failure to file a discretionary application thus deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/26/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kathy May Toth v. Gloria Naegele May, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathy-may-toth-v-gloria-naegele-may-gactapp-2019.