Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company

Sixth Circuit

Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company

192 F.2d 1022, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1951

Docket11394

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 F.2d 1022 (Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, 192 F.2d 1022, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered on the record in the cause, the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered in the District Court, and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the respective parties;

And it appearing that the findings of fact are based upon substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law are properly drawn upon the authority of Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Company, N. Y., D.C.W.D.Ky., 38 F.Supp. 455, opinion by Judge Miller, affirmed, per *1023 curiam, 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 257; and Yorkshire Indemnity Company of New York v. Collier, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 116.

The judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant below is affirmed. D.C., 96 F.Supp. 380.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered on the record in the cause, the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered in the District Court, and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the respective parties;

And it appearing that the findings of fact are based upon substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law are properly drawn upon the authority of Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Company, N. Y., D.C.W.D.Ky., 38 F.Supp. 455, opinion by Judge Miller, affirmed, per *1023 curiam, 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 257; and Yorkshire Indemnity Company of New York v. Collier, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 116.

The judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant below is affirmed. D.C., 96 F.Supp. 380.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F.2d 1022, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathryn-wise-and-howard-g-wise-v-ohio-casualty-insurance-company-ca6-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack