Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company

192 F.2d 1022, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1951·No. 11394·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been heard and considered on the record in the cause, the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered in the District Court, and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the respective parties;

And it appearing that the findings of fact are based upon substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law are properly drawn upon the authority of Vezolles v. Home Indemnity Company, N. Y., D.C.W.D.Ky., 38 F.Supp. 455, opinion by Judge Miller, affirmed, per *1023 curiam, 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 257; and Yorkshire Indemnity Company of New York v. Collier, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 116.

The judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant below is affirmed. D.C., 96 F.Supp. 380.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, 192 F.2d 1022, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2850 (6th Cir. 1951).

192 F.2d 1022 (Kathryn Wise and Howard G. Wise v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coureas v. Allstate Insurance
92 S.E.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1956)