Kathman v. Walters
This text of 22 La. Ann. 54 (Kathman v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no reason to disturb the judgment of the District Court in this case. The allegation that the claim of the intervenor for rent was founded upon a contract reprobated by law — the hiring of a house to be used as a brothel — seems to be sustained by the evidence. The claim for rent was therefore properly rejected.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from bo affirmed, at the costs of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 La. Ann. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathman-v-walters-la-1870.