Kathleen Wild v. Frank J. Schuster, Individually and as of the Estate of Frank Schuster

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
Docket13-11-00383-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kathleen Wild v. Frank J. Schuster, Individually and as of the Estate of Frank Schuster (Kathleen Wild v. Frank J. Schuster, Individually and as of the Estate of Frank Schuster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kathleen Wild v. Frank J. Schuster, Individually and as of the Estate of Frank Schuster, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00383-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

KATHLEEN WILD, Appellant,

v.

FRANK J. SCHUSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FRANK SCHUSTER, ET AL., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the Probate Court at Law No. 3 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Kathleen Wild, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

Probate Court at Law No. 3 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number P-12,779-C.

Appellant has filed a notice to withdraw appeal on grounds that she no longer wishes to

pursue the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to

withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to withdraw the appeal is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 22nd day of November, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kathleen Wild v. Frank J. Schuster, Individually and as of the Estate of Frank Schuster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathleen-wild-v-frank-j-schuster-individually-and-as-of-the-estate-of-texapp-2011.