Kathleen Marra Mole v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Kathleen Marra Mole v. United States

330 F.2d 1022, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5632

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1964

Docket21009_1

StatusPublished

This text of 330 F.2d 1022 (Kathleen Marra Mole v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kathleen Marra Mole v. United States, 330 F.2d 1022, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5632 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict of guilty under an indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 703. On a previous appearance we reversed the conviction of appellant on the same charge because of the improper admission of evidence and remanded for a new trial. Mole v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 156.

The evidence discloses, as it did on the prior appeal, that a jury question was presented as to guilt or innocence. A careful consideration of the errors assigned in the light of the record and the applicable law convinces us that all are without merit, and that the judgment should be, and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict of guilty under an indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 703. On a previous appearance we reversed the conviction of appellant on the same charge because of the improper admission of evidence and remanded for a new trial. Mole v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 156.

The evidence discloses, as it did on the prior appeal, that a jury question was presented as to guilt or innocence. A careful consideration of the errors assigned in the light of the record and the applicable law convinces us that all are without merit, and that the judgment should be, and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 F.2d 1022, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathleen-marra-mole-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack