Kathleen Kicinski v. North Carolina A & T State

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 5, 2014
• Docket: 14-1111
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1111

KATHLEEN KICINSKI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: August 29, 2014 Decided: September 5, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General, Gary R. Govert, Assistant Solicitor General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kathleen Kicinski, a former employee of Defendant

North Carolina A & T University (“University”), appeals the

district court’s order granting the University’s Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in her employment

discrimination action. We have reviewed the district court’s

ruling de novo, see Butler v. United States, 702 F.3d 749, 751-

52 (4th Cir. 2012) (setting forth standard of review), cert.

denied, 133 S. Ct. 2398 (2013), in conjunction with the relevant

record and the parties’ briefs, and discern no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Kicinski

v. N.C. A & T State Univ., No. 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.

Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED