Katherine Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of Katherine Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Katherine Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
KATHERINE SCHUMAN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-0804
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed September 8, 2016.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Toby S. Monaco, Judge.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, for Appellant.
Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Y. Rottmann, and C.H. Houston, III, of McGuireWoods LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Katherine Schuman, raises three issues in this appeal from a
final judgment of foreclosure. In her third issue, she argues that the trial court erred
in denying her motion for involuntary dismissal. We disagree and affirm this issue.
With regard to the two remaining issues, the appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
concedes that the appellant was denied the opportunity to fully and fairly present her case to the trial court. This concession is well taken, and therefore, the Judgment of
Foreclosure is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED for a new trial.
ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Katherine Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katherine-schuman-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-fladistctapp-2016.