Katherine L. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution

Fourth Circuit

Katherine L. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21752, 1995 WL 352512

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-2127

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1066 (Katherine L. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katherine L. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution, 57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21752, 1995 WL 352512 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Katherine L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Katherine L. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Finley Boston, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Appellant's Title VII action, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Dep't of Air Pollution, No. CA-93-354 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Katherine L. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Department of Air Pollution,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Katherine L. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Finley Boston, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Appellant's Title VII action, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Dep't of Air Pollution, No. CA-93-354 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21752, 1995 WL 352512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katherine-l-miller-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-depa-ca4-1995.