Katherine Hiett Viker v. Arthur Collin Cherry
This text of Katherine Hiett Viker v. Arthur Collin Cherry (Katherine Hiett Viker v. Arthur Collin Cherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
KATHERINE HIETT VIKER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
v. CASE NO. 1D17-2865
ARTHUR COLLIN CHERRY,
Appellee. _______________________________/
Opinion filed September 27, 2017.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stewart E. Parsons, Judge.
Emilian "Ian" Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The Court has determined that the May 5, 2017, order partially ruling on a
petition to modify parenting schedule and child support is not a final order. See
Hoffman v. O'Connor, 802 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Furthermore,
although the order was subject to immediate appellate review pursuant to Florida
Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)b., appellant failed to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction to review the order in a timely manner. Ward v. Bragg, 957 So.
2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that rehearing of a non-final order is not
authorized and does not delay rendition). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for
lack of jurisdiction.
BILBREY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Katherine Hiett Viker v. Arthur Collin Cherry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katherine-hiett-viker-v-arthur-collin-cherry-fladistctapp-2017.