Katherine Dauphin v. Beverly Hennager

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1858

KATHERINE R. DAUPHIN,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BEVERLY L. HENNAGER,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

LOUIS A. JENNINGS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00149-LO-TCB)

Submitted: November 7, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly L. Hennager, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Beverly L. Hennager appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation to validate an attorney’s charging lien filed by Hennager’s

former law firm, Troutman Sanders LLP. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Troutman Sanders’ motion to intervene and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dauphin v. Hennager, No. 1:15-cv-

00149-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. June 15, 2018). We deny Hennager’s application to proceed

in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED