Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 18, 2024·No. 22-1419·Published

Opinion

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 22–1419

Polk County No. LACL145293 ORDER

Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius, Appellees,

vs.

State of Iowa,

Appellant.

The court, May, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2024).

The district court denied the State’s partial motion for summary judgment.

We granted the State’s application for interlocutory review and transferred the case to the court of appeals. The court of appeals affirmed. Christensen, C.J., and Oxley and McDermott, JJ., would affirm the court of appeals decision and district court judgment; Waterman, Mansfield, and McDonald, JJ., would vacate the court of appeals decision and reverse the district court judgment. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided . . . , the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:

Nicholas Kilburg Job Mukkaka Assistant Attorney General Hoover State Office Building 1305 E. Walnut Street Des Moines, IA 50319

Todd Klapatauskas 110 East 9th Street P.O. Box 239 Dubuque, IA 52004

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa, (iowa 2024).

Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa (Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Effler
769 N.W.2d 880 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2009)