Kathary v. State

1919 OK CR 39, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 11, 1919
DocketNo. A-2812.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 39 (Kathary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kathary v. State, 1919 OK CR 39, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The information in this case charged that Jack Kathary did keep a place in the town of Wirt, Garter county, known as the “Oil Exchange,” with the intention and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. On his trial the jury rendered a verdict finding him guilty as charged, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for 30 days and a fine qf $500. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected.

This is a prosecution under section 4, c. 26, Session Laws 1913, which provision of the statute was in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional ánft void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Proctor Case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 39, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 673, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kathary-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.