Kates v. State
288 So. 2d 260
Opinion
The prosecutor did argue improperly to the jury, but on the entire record we find that the error is harmless.
It was error to sentence Kates on count II, and the sentence on that count is vacated. Cone v. State, Fla.1973, 285 So.2d 12; Hernandez v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 278 So.2d 307. We see no necessity for the return of the appellant for resentencing,
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kates v. State, 288 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
288 So. 2d 260 (Kates v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hernandez v. State
278 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Cone v. State
285 So. 2d 12 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)