Katenkamp v. Townsend

247 A.D. 864

This text of 247 A.D. 864 (Katenkamp v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katenkamp v. Townsend, 247 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action for an accounting against the stock brokerage firm of Morrison & Townsend, in which plaintiff claims that that firm had wrongfully charged her account with unauthorized purchases. The firm of W. E. Hutton & Co. was impleaded as defendants on a cross-claim by Morrison & Townsend. Judgment, entered on a decision after trial at Special Term, in favor of plaintiff against defendants Morrison & Townsend for $11,071.14 unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against said defendants. Judgment in favor of defendants Morrison & Townsend against the impleaded defendants W. E. Hutton & Co. for $11,192.97 unanimously affirmed, with costs to defendants Morrison & Townsend against the impleaded defendants W. E. Hutton & Co. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [160 Misc. 118.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Katenkamp v. Townsend
160 Misc. 118 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katenkamp-v-townsend-nyappdiv-1936.