Katebi v. Ashcroft

396 F.3d 463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Katebi v. Ashcroft. Read the opinion of the Court — 396 F.3d 463
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 4, 2005·No. 03-2550·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 03-2550

FARHAD KATEBI,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on February 3, 2005, should be amended as follows.

On page 4, line 21, insert after "framework" the following sentence:

"When an applicant has a colorable claim to [permanent] resident status, as [Katebi] does, the INS has the burden of proving that he is not eligible for admission to the United States by clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence." Singh v. Reno, 113 F.3d 1512, 1514 (9th Cir. 1997).

On page 6, line 6-7 replace "Singh v. Reno, 113 F.3d 1512, 1514 (9th Cir. 1997)." with "Singh, 113 F. 3d at 1514."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katebi v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 463 (1st Cir. 2005).

396 F.3d 463 (Katebi v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singh v. Reno
113 F.3d 1512 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)