Kate Spade LLC v. Vinci Brands LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KATESPADELLC tal. StS
Plaintiffs, 23-CV-05409 (LGS) (VF) -against- ORDER VINCI BRANDS LLC, et al., Defendants. VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge Kate Spade LLC, Coach Services, Inc., and Tapestry, Inc. filed a motion to seal Exhibits B, D, and F to the Letter Motion Requesting Permission to Reopen Depositions at ECF No. 381 but did not put forth a basis for sealing other than relying on the stipulation and confidentiality order at ECF No. 193. Similarly, Kate Spade LLC filed a motion to provisionally seal Exhibits F and G to its Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint at ECF No. 303 but did not put forth a basis for permanently sealing the documents. The provisional seals on ECF No. 304, ECF No. 305, and ECF No. 382 will be lifted if a showing is not made under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Interested parties are directed to file their submission in support of permanently sealing the documents by November 1, 2024. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York October 23, 2024 \ \ 4 iM \ UW UA VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kate Spade LLC v. Vinci Brands LLC (Kate Spade LLC v. Vinci Brands LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.