KATCHUK, RICHARD v. TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2012·No. CA 11-01301·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

317 CA 11-01301 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

JASON BURLEW, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, AND RICHARD KATCHUK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, ALBANY (JOHN T. MCMANUS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAMSON, CLUNE & STEVENS, ITHACA (JOHN H. HANRAHAN, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered April 19, 2011 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, granted the cross motion of plaintiff Richard Katchuk for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KATCHUK, RICHARD v. TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

KATCHUK, RICHARD v. TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC. (KATCHUK, RICHARD v. TALISMAN ENERGY USA INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)