Katcher v. Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katcher v. Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District

272 A.D.2d 400, 707 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 400 (Katcher v. Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katcher v. Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District, 272 A.D.2d 400, 707 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District, dated August 26, 1998, that the petitioner was ineligible to apply for a 1998 early retirement incentive, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated April 16, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court [401]*401did not err in denying the petition. The respondent’s determination to refuse to extend the period in which the petitioner could apply for the 1998 early retirement incentive (see, L 1998, ch 47) was neither arbitrary nor capricious (cf, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231). Sullivan, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education Hicksville Union Free School District, dated August 26, 1998, that the petitioner was ineligible to apply for a 1998 early retirement incentive, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated April 16, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court [401]*401did not err in denying the petition. The respondent’s determination to refuse to extend the period in which the petitioner could apply for the 1998 early retirement incentive (see, L 1998, ch 47) was neither arbitrary nor capricious (cf, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231). Sullivan, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 400, 707 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katcher-v-board-of-education-hicksville-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2000.