Katchatag v. State of Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska·Decided October 6, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00003·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

RAYMOND C. KATCHATAG, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-00003-SLG v. STATE OF ALASKA, et al., Defendants.

ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS

Self-represented prisoner Raymond Katchatag (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action in Juneau Superior Court on January 26, 2023.1 On June 7, 2023, Defendant Gabe Gluesing removed this action from state court to the District Court for the District of Alaska (“the Court”).2 On July 3, 2023, Defendant Gluesing filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Civil Rule 12(b)(6).3 By order dated August 18,

2023, Plaintiff was accorded 21 days from that date in which to file an opposition to the motion, but no opposition was filed. Rather, on September 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed two motions: a Motion for Extension of Time to File Re-Amended Complaint

1 Docket 5-1 at 6. 2 Dockets 1-5. 3 Docket 6. at Docket 9, and Motion to Obtain the Full Medical File and Mental Health File from D.O.C. at Docket 10. This order addresses all of these motions. 1. Motion to Obtain Department of Corrections (“DOC”) Records

At Docket 10, Plaintiff requests the Court order DOC to provide him with his medical and mental health records from 2016 to date. Defendant Gluesing responded to the motion at Docket 11, noting that the DOC has not yet been served with the summons and complaint in this action.4 As the state court judge previously explained to Plaintiff when he sought the same relief in that court, the Court does

not have personal jurisdiction over the DOC at this time.5 Further, as counsel for Defendant Gluesing explained in his response, a litigant, including a self- represented litigant, must first make a formal discovery request to an opposing party pursuant to the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, then attempt to confer in good faith with the party who is resisting discovery, before filing a motion

to compel.6 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for an order directing DOC to provide Plaintiff with his medical file at Docket 10 is DENIED at this time for these reasons.

4 See Docket 1 at 3 and subsequent docket following removal. 5 Docket 1 at 17. And, as the state superior court previously informed Plaintiff, the requested information may be available from DOC upon request. See State of Alaksa Department of Corrections Policy and Procedure 807.06 (establishing procedures for access to prisoner health care records). Docket 17 at 49, n.1. 6 See Docket 11 at 2. Case No. 1:23-cv-00003-SLG, Katchatag v. State of Alaska, et al. 2. Motion for Extension of Time to Amend the Complaint At Docket 9, Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file a “Re-Amended Complaint” after he receives his medical file, which he estimates will take at least

120 days.7 Once a case has been removed, a plaintiff may amend the pleadings filed in the state court in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. For the reasons expressed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to the extent it will accord Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint in accordance with the guidance herein.

Requirements to State a Claim in an Amended Complaint To state a claim, a complaint need only contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”8 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’”9 A claim is “plausible” when the facts alleged support a

reasonable inference that the plaintiff is entitled to relief from a specific defendant for specific misconduct. A complaint need not, and should not, contain or have attached to it all medical records. Rather, a complaint must state sufficient facts that state a viable

7 Docket 9. 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). 9 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). Case No. 1:23-cv-00003-SLG, Katchatag v. State of Alaska, et al. claim for relief.10 An amended complaint is insufficiently plead if it offers “naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement.”11 An amended complaint must set out each claim for relief separately. Each claim should identify (1) the specific

injury that a plaintiff is alleging has occurred to him, (2) when that injury occurred, (3) where that injury was caused, and (4) who he is alleging caused that specific injury to him. In this Court, an amended complaint replaces the prior complaint in its entirety. “The proposed amended pleading must not incorporate by reference any

prior pleading, including exhibits.”12 Any claims not included in the amended complaint will be considered waived. Plaintiff must also serve a copy of any amended complaint upon the attorney for Gabe Gluesing. Because a party does not need his complete medical records to state a viable claim for relief in a complaint, the Court will only grant Plaintiff 30 days from

the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint that remedies the deficiencies in the original complaint that are identified in this order.

10 Id. 11 Id. (internal citations and quotations omitted). 12 Local Civil Rule 15.1. Case No. 1:23-cv-00003-SLG, Katchatag v. State of Alaska, et al. Statute of Limitations Plaintiff’s original complaint discusses events that occurred from 2016 to 2021.13 But if a claim is not filed within the applicable statute of limitations,

dismissal of that claim is proper, including when a plaintiff is self-represented.14 A statute of limitations bars claims after a specified based on the date when the claim accrued (as when the injury occurred or was discovered).15 Because 42 U.S.C. § 1983 does not contain its own statute of limitations, federal courts apply the state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions.16 In Alaska, the statute of

limitations for personal injury claims is two-years.17 Plaintiff initiated this case in the Juneau Superior Court on January 26, 2023.18 Therefore, in any amended complaint, Plaintiff must not include claims regarding events that allegedly occurred before January 26, 2021.

13 Docket 5-1. 14 Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp., 442 P.3d 763, 766, 769 (Alaska 2019) (dismissing self- represented plaintiff's complaint for failure to bring tort claim within two years of cause of action's accrual). 15 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019). 16 Butler v. Nat’l Cmty. Renaissance of Cal., 766 F.3d 1191, 1198 (9th Cir. 2014). 17 Alaska Statute § 09.10.070. 18 Docket 5-1 at 6. Case No. 1:23-cv-00003-SLG, Katchatag v. State of Alaska, et al. 3. Defendant Gabe Gluesing’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Civil Rule 12(b)(6)

Defendant Gluesing’s motion to dismiss the original complaint in this action at Docket 6 is GRANTED for the reasons discussed in Defendant Gluesing’s motion. However, as discussed above, the dismissal of the complaint will be with leave to file an amended complaint consistent with the terms of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katchatag v. State of Alaska, (D. Alaska 2023).

Katchatag v. State of Alaska (Katchatag v. State of Alaska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of La
766 F.3d 1191 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp.
442 P.3d 763 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2019)