Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 2018·No. 16-AA-1091 order·Published

Opinion

District of Columbia

Court of Appeals FEB 91 238 ozai“azz“o;:ooz_t; _ No. 16-AA-1091 " " C-JUWW *"PPEA%SA I<;ATARINA STRAUGHN, Petitioner, v. CRB?I-IG

D.C. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES (WORKER’ S COMPENSATION), Respondent,

and

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Intervenor.

BEFORE: Biackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge; McLeese, Associate Judge and Nebeker, Senior lodge

On consideration appellant’s motion to publish, and intervenor’S opposition, it is

ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and judgment is granted, and the C}erk Shail issue the attached opinion forthwith

PER CURIAM_

No. 16-AA-109l Copies to:

Timothy Fitzpatrick Compensation Review Board 4058 Minnesota Avenue, NE Suite 4005

Washington, DC 20019

Copies e»served to:

Krsita N. DeSmyter, Esquire 7852 Waiker Drive

Suite 300

Greenbelt, MD 20770

Mark H. Dho, Esquire

Sarah O. Rollman, Esquire

Oft`ice of General Counsef

Washington Metropolitan Are 'Transit authority 600 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 200}

Loron L. Alikhan, Esquire Acting Soficitor General for DC 441 4‘]‘ Street, NW

Suite 6008

Washington, DC 20001

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order), (D.C. 2018).

Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order) (Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.