Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order)
This text of Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order) (Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
District of Columbia
Court of Appeals FEB 91 238 ozai“azz“o;:ooz_t; _ No. 16-AA-1091 " " C-JUWW *"PPEA%SA I<;ATARINA STRAUGHN, Petitioner, v. CRB?I-IG
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES (WORKER’ S COMPENSATION), Respondent,
and
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Intervenor.
BEFORE: Biackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge; McLeese, Associate Judge and Nebeker, Senior lodge 0 R D E R
On consideration appellant’s motion to publish, and intervenor’S opposition, it is
ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and judgment is granted, and the C}erk Shail issue the attached opinion forthwith
PER CURIAM_
No. 16-AA-109l Copies to:
Timothy Fitzpatrick Compensation Review Board 4058 Minnesota Avenue, NE Suite 4005
Washington, DC 20019
Copies e»served to:
Krsita N. DeSmyter, Esquire 7852 Waiker Drive
Suite 300
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Mark H. Dho, Esquire
Sarah O. Rollman, Esquire
Oft`ice of General Counsef
Washington Metropolitan Are 'Transit authority 600 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 200}
Loron L. Alikhan, Esquire Acting Soficitor General for DC 441 4‘]‘ Street, NW
Suite 6008
Washington, DC 20001
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Katarina Straughn v. DOES / WMATA (order), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katarina-straughn-v-does-wmata-order-dc-2018.