Kasum Communications, Inc. v. CPI NORTH DRUID COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kasum Communications, Inc. v. CPI NORTH DRUID COMPANY

217 S.E.2d 492, 135 Ga. App. 314, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1659

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 2, 1975

Docket50502

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 217 S.E.2d 492 (Kasum Communications, Inc. v. CPI NORTH DRUID COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kasum Communications, Inc. v. CPI NORTH DRUID COMPANY, 217 S.E.2d 492, 135 Ga. App. 314, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1659 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering as part of its judgment for the appellee, CPI, an award for $2,404.80 for attorney fees. The lease agreement between the appellant, Kasum, and CPI provided that if CPI had to collect the rent from Kasum through an attorney at law, Kasum agreed to pay 15% thereof as attorney fees. The lease also contained an acceleration clause for rent whenever Kasum defaulted under the lease. In its complaint, as amended, CPI prayed for $30,728 for 10 1/2 months "rent owing” and unpaid. The complaint also contained an "Attorney’s Fee Notice” paragraph, wherein CPI informed Kasum of its intention to enforce the attorney fee provision of the lease. The trial judge, in its order granting CPI’s motion for summary judgment, found that Kasum was chargeable for rent due for only six months ($16,032), and on the basis of that amount, awarded attorney fees to CPI for $2,404.80. Kasum’s appeal asserts that the award of that attorney fee was erroneous because the notice of enforcement in the complaint was not given after maturity as required by Code Ann. § 20-506. Since the term of the lease was 10 years, Kasum’s obligation for rent thereunder, it contends, was not to mature until 1984, and notice prior to that time violated the statute. Held:

Code§ 20-506,as last amended by Ga. L. 1968, p.317, provides in pertinent part: "(c). The holder of the note or other evidence of indebtedness, or his attorney at law, shall, after maturity of the obligation, notify in writing the maker, indorser or party sought to be held on said obligation that the provisions relative to payment of attorney’s fees in addition to the principal and interest shall be enforced and that such maker, indorser or party sought to be held on said obligation has 10 days from the receipt of such notice to pay the principal and interest without the attorney’s fees.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Appellant’s contention that the maturity of its obligation under the lease was not until 1984 overlooks the acceleration clause in the lease. That clause provides *315 that upon default by the lessee (Kasum), the lessor may declare "the entire amount of the rent which would become due and payable during the remainder of the term of the lease to be due and payable immediately, in which event, lessee agrees to pay same at once . . .” CPI accelerated the rent and demanded of Kasum full payment of all rents and had received no money whatsoever. Under these circumstances, Kasum’s obligation had matured, and the notice given by CPI was in compliance with Code Ann. § 20-506.

Argued April 7, 1975 Decided July 2, 1975. Claude E. Hambrick, D. W. Latimore, Jr., for appellant. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, John J. Dalton, William G. McDaniel, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering as part of its judgment for the appellee, CPI, an award for $2,404.80 for attorney fees. The lease agreement between the appellant, Kasum, and CPI provided that if CPI had to collect the rent from Kasum through an attorney at law, Kasum agreed to pay 15% thereof as attorney fees. The lease also contained an acceleration clause for rent whenever Kasum defaulted under the lease. In its complaint, as amended, CPI prayed for $30,728 for 10 1/2 months "rent owing” and unpaid. The complaint also contained an "Attorney’s Fee Notice” paragraph, wherein CPI informed Kasum of its intention to enforce the attorney fee provision of the lease. The trial judge, in its order granting CPI’s motion for summary judgment, found that Kasum was chargeable for rent due for only six months ($16,032), and on the basis of that amount, awarded attorney fees to CPI for $2,404.80. Kasum’s appeal asserts that the award of that attorney fee was erroneous because the notice of enforcement in the complaint was not given after maturity as required by Code Ann. § 20-506. Since the term of the lease was 10 years, Kasum’s obligation for rent thereunder, it contends, was not to mature until 1984, and notice prior to that time violated the statute. Held:

Code§ 20-506,as last amended by Ga. L. 1968, p.317, provides in pertinent part: "(c). The holder of the note or other evidence of indebtedness, or his attorney at law, shall, after maturity of the obligation, notify in writing the maker, indorser or party sought to be held on said obligation that the provisions relative to payment of attorney’s fees in addition to the principal and interest shall be enforced and that such maker, indorser or party sought to be held on said obligation has 10 days from the receipt of such notice to pay the principal and interest without the attorney’s fees.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Appellant’s contention that the maturity of its obligation under the lease was not until 1984 overlooks the acceleration clause in the lease. That clause provides *315 that upon default by the lessee (Kasum), the lessor may declare "the entire amount of the rent which would become due and payable during the remainder of the term of the lease to be due and payable immediately, in which event, lessee agrees to pay same at once . . .” CPI accelerated the rent and demanded of Kasum full payment of all rents and had received no money whatsoever. Under these circumstances, Kasum’s obligation had matured, and the notice given by CPI was in compliance with Code Ann. § 20-506.

Argued April 7, 1975 Decided July 2, 1975. Claude E. Hambrick, D. W. Latimore, Jr., for appellant. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, John J. Dalton, William G. McDaniel, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 S.E.2d 492, 135 Ga. App. 314, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kasum-communications-inc-v-cpi-north-druid-company-gactapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack