Kastrow v. State
This text of 2005 ND 58 (Kastrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/23/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND 58
Dwight Kastrow, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20040318
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Steven Balaban (on brief), 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 102, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4046, for petitioner and appellant.
Lloyd Clayton Suhr (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellee.
Kastrow v. State
[¶1] Dwight Kastrow appealed from an order denying his petition for post-
conviction relief, asserting the trial court erred in finding Kastrow failed to establish he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his criminal proceedings and also asserting improper judicial intervention by the trial court in the plea process.
[¶2] Affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Mary Muehlen Maring
[¶4] The Honorable William A. Neumann, a member of the Court when this case was heard, resigned effective March 14, 2005, and did not participate in this decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 ND 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kastrow-v-state-nd-2005.