Kastrat v. Wynnykiw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kastrat v. Wynnykiw

22 A.D.3d 242, 801 N.Y.S.2d 533

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 242 (Kastrat v. Wynnykiw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kastrat v. Wynnykiw, 22 A.D.3d 242, 801 N.Y.S.2d 533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered on or about June 3, 2004, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants-appellants’ pleadings unless, within seven days, defendants provided a new response to plaintiffs’ interrogatories and paid plaintiffs costs of $750 awarded pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The subject order was properly based on defendants’ noncompliance with court orders directing it to answer plaintiffs’ interrogatories (CPLR 3126 [3]; see Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711 [1986]).

We have considered defendants’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Sullivan and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered on or about June 3, 2004, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants-appellants’ pleadings unless, within seven days, defendants provided a new response to plaintiffs’ interrogatories and paid plaintiffs costs of $750 awarded pursuant to 22 NYCRR part 130, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The subject order was properly based on defendants’ noncompliance with court orders directing it to answer plaintiffs’ interrogatories (CPLR 3126 [3]; see Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711 [1986]).

We have considered defendants’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Sullivan and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 242, 801 N.Y.S.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kastrat-v-wynnykiw-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack