Kastor v. Newhouse
This text of 4 E.D. Smith 20 (Kastor v. Newhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
Without expressing any opinion upon the questions wMch might have arisen had the [21]*21manner of the defendant’s letting the property been shown, or the terms thereof, or if it had appeared that the defendant’s premises were let ont in apartments to various tenants, we think, that upon mere proof that the premises were occupied by the defendant’s tenants, the rale presumptively applies that the tenant is bound to repair, and, therefore, that the landlord is not liable for the neglect to do so, in accordance with the principles of Payne v. Rogers, 2 H. B. L. 349; Cheetham v. Hampton, 4 T. R. 318; Blunt v. Acker, 15 Wend. 524, and Waggoner v. Jermaine, 3 Denio, 306.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 E.D. Smith 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kastor-v-newhouse-nyctcompl-1855.