Kassler v. . Tinsley

153 S.E. 411, 198 N.C. 781, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 485
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 6, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It was held in Lumber Co. v. Welch, 197 N. C., 249, 148 S. E., 250, construing chapter 18, Public Laws, Extra Session, 1924, that, unless a copy of the answer containing a counterclaim is served on the plaintiff or his attorney, the allegations going to make up such counterclaim are to be considered and dealt with as denied. Hence, under authority of the Welch case, it would seem that the plaintiff’s motion is well founded.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kassler v. . Tinsley, 153 S.E. 411, 198 N.C. 781, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 485 (N.C. 1930).

153 S.E. 411 (Kassler v. . Tinsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boone v. Sparrow
70 S.E.2d 204 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Carter v. . R. R.
81 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)