Kassicieh v. Battisti (In re Kassicieh)

482 B.R. 190, 2012 WL 5910623
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2012·No. BAP No. 12-8015·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

[191] OPINION

ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This appeal presents the issue of whether fees owed to a court-appointed guardian ad litem, constitute a “domestic support obligation” under Section 101(14A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are therefore a non-dischargeable debt. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, and after the benefit of oral argument, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err in determining that the fees owed to the guardian ad litem constitute a “domestic support obligation.” Accordingly, the fees owed are nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on March 30, 2012, In re Kassicieh, 467 B.R. 445 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kassicieh v. Battisti (In re Kassicieh), 482 B.R. 190, 2012 WL 5910623 (bap6 2012).

482 B.R. 190 (Kassicieh v. Battisti (In re Kassicieh)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hagemann v. Durkin
D. New Mexico, 2023
Keith Michael Corson
D. New Hampshire, 2021
Jimmie Thad Stuteville
D. New Mexico, 2019
In re: James Thomas v.
Sixth Circuit, 2014
In re Thomas
511 B.R. 89 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Rackley v. Rackley (In re Rackley)
502 B.R. 615 (N.D. Georgia, 2013)