Kassey A. Williams v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 22, 2019
Docket04-19-00673-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kassey A. Williams v. State (Kassey A. Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kassey A. Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 22, 2019

No. 04-19-00673-CR

Kassey A. WILLIAMS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR8544 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion to automatically reverse magistrate’s findings. Our records show James Oltersdorf has been appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of October, 2019.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA, Chief Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kassey A. Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kassey-a-williams-v-state-texapp-2019.