Kass v. Kaplan
279 A.D. 595, 107 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3130
Opinion
Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that the judgment improperly extends, by implication, a restrictive covenant to the fifteen-foot parcel which was never subject thereto. (See Kitching v. Brown, 180 N. Y. 414, 427.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kass v. Kaplan, 279 A.D. 595, 107 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 595 (Kass v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kitching v. . Brown
73 N.E. 241 (New York Court of Appeals, 1905)