Kass & Co. v. Beredyn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kass & Co. v. Beredyn

19 Misc. 2d 549, 195 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3545

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Misc. 2d 549 (Kass & Co. v. Beredyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kass & Co. v. Beredyn, 19 Misc. 2d 549, 195 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no irregularity on the face of either note to put plaintiff on notice that there were any restrictions surrounding the delivery of the notes, nor is there any proof that plaintiff had knowledge thereof.

The order denying summary judgment to plaintiff should be reversed, and summary judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, with $10 costs.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There was no irregularity on the face of either note to put plaintiff on notice that there were any restrictions surrounding the delivery of the notes, nor is there any proof that plaintiff had knowledge thereof.

The order denying summary judgment to plaintiff should be reversed, and summary judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, with $10 costs.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Misc. 2d 549, 195 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kass-co-v-beredyn-nyappterm-1959.