Kasperek v. Rumsfeld
556 F.2d 557
Opinion
556 F.2d 557
Kasperek
v.
Rumsfeld
No. 76-2090
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
11/9/76
W.D.N.Y.
VACATED AND REMANDED*
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no juri sprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opi nion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0 .23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kasperek v. Rumsfeld, 556 F.2d 557 (2d Cir. 1976).
556 F.2d 557 (Kasperek v. Rumsfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.